by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in [Salina, Kan.? .
Written in English
|Other titles||Watershed plan and environmental impact statement for Grasshopper-Coal Creek watershed, Atchison, Brown and Jefferson Counties, Kansas, Grasshopper-Coal Creek watershed, Atchison, Brown, and Jefferson Counties, Kansas|
|Contributions||Delaware Watershed Joint District No. 10 (Kan.)|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||1 v. (various pagings) :|
Watershed plan and environmental impact statement: Grasshopper-Coal Creek Watershed, Atchison, Brown, and Jefferson Counties, Kansas ; prepared under the authority of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, Public Law , as amended (16 USC ) and in accordance with Section (2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of , Public Law , as amended . Final Watershed Plan− Areawide Environmental Impact Statement November Page i Watershed Plan and Areawide Environmental Impact Statement for the Cape Cod Water Resources Restoration Project Prepared by: United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Sponsors: Cape Cod Conservation District. Final plan and final environmental impact statement: Cedar Run Watershed, Fauquier County, Virginia. Responsibility for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act rests with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS). The sponsoring local organizations (sponsors) which requested planning assistance are the Shavano Soil Conservation District, Uncompahgre Water Users Association.
NEPA analysis in the form of a Watershed Plan and Environmental Assessment (Plan-EA) to analyze impacts to the natural and human environment from this project. The EA process will comply with the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations at 40 CFR Parts , which require an evaluation of potential environmental impacts associated with federal projects and actions. The watershed planning and implementation steps are similar for healthy and impaired watersheds, but the overall watershed plan goals and management strategies will vary depending on local and regional priorities, conservation programs, and regulatory requirementsor other . To the Agency or Individual Addressed: Reference: Final Environmental Impact Statement. Attached is the final environmental impact statement (EIS) for the proposed Sweetheart Lake Hydroelectric Project (No. ), which would be located in the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska. Environmental impact assessment cannot be divorced from social impact of the project, hence the latter is considered as a key dimension of the EIA process. Examples of these close interactions can be found in the context of land tenure and rights, rural livelihoods, and traditional practices.
Watershed plan and environmental impact statement: South Branch Little Nemaha watershed, Johnson, Lancaster, and Otoe Counties, Nebraska Author: Nemaha Natural Resources District. Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report, and Targeted Watershed Management Plan September 16, Little Pond, Great Pond, Green Pond, Bournes Pond, Eel Pond, and Waquoit Bay Watersheds and Recommendations for West Falmouth Harbor Watershed Volume #2, Report Figures and Appendices. public disclosure of potential environmental impacts occur throughout the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) preparation process. The United States Army Corp s of Engineers, Omaha District (Corps), is the lead agency overseeing the preparation of an EIS for the proposed Regional Watershed Supply Project (RWSP). watershed organizations; and state, local, tribal and federal environmental agencies develop and implement watershed plans to meet water quality standards and protect water resources. It will be particularly useful to persons working with impaired or threatened waters. The goals of this module are as follows: Introduce a flexible framework for.